Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGünen, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBayar, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorKarakaş, Mustafa Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-24T15:31:48Z
dc.date.available2020-05-24T15:31:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGunen, A., Bayar, S., Karakas, M.S. (2020). Effect of Different Arc Welding Processes on the Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties of Ramor 500 Armor Steel. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology ASME, 142(2): 021007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045569en_US
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.issn1528-8889
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045569
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12508/1119
dc.descriptionWOS: 000525414900007en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, Ramor 500 armor steel plates were automatically welded using cold metal transfer arc welding (CMT), gas metal arc welding (GMAW), and hybrid plasma arc welding (HPAW) methods. To investigate the effects of three different fusion welding methods on metallurgical and mechanical properties, the welded joints were examined using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and also subjected to radiographic, hardness, tensile, and notched impact tests. The weld metal (WM) region of the GMAW and HPAW joints consisted of massive austenite. In the CMT welded joint, the WM consisted mainly of dendritic austenite and a minor amount of delta-ferrite. Regardless of the welding process, the hardness of both the WM and heat-affected zone (HAZ) regions was found to be higher than the base metal (BM). The tensile strengths obtained by CMT, GMAW, and HPAW were 45%, 50%, and 65% of the BM, respectively. Cleavage-type brittle fractures occurred in the GMAW and HPAW welded joints, while localized ductile fractures occurred in the CMT joints. Tensile test specimens of the CMT joints fractured in the WM, while the GMAW and HPAW joints fractured in the HAZ. In terms of notch toughness, the CMT joints exhibited better impact resistance compared with the BM. GMAW and HPAW joints displayed less impact resistance than the BM, with values comparable with previous studies in the literature.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsmeen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1115/1.4045569en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArmor steelen_US
dc.subjectWeldingen_US
dc.subjectMicrostructureen_US
dc.subjectHeat-affected zoneen_US
dc.subjectMechanical propertiesen_US
dc.subjectJoiningen_US
dc.subjectMechanical behavioren_US
dc.subject.classificationEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.classificationMechanicalen_US
dc.subject.classificationMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.subject.otherImpact propertiesen_US
dc.subject.otherConsumablesen_US
dc.subject.otherTensileen_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Arc Welding Processes on the Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties of Ramor 500 Armor Steelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology (ASME)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi -- Metalurji ve Malzeme Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume142en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.isteauthorGünen, Alien_US
dc.contributor.isteauthorBayar, Selçuken_US
dc.relation.indexWeb of Science Core Collection - Science Citation Index Expandeden_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster